The Roar » Bruce Walkley

Collingwood’s jumper stance defies belief

Bruce Walkley — Sun, 03 May 2009 21:11:49 +0000

Brady Rawlings of North Melbourne gathers the ball ahead of Dane Swan of Collingwood during the AFL Round 06 match between the North Melbourne Kangaroos and the Collingwood Magpies at the Docklands Stadium. Slattery Images

How much longer will the AFL let Collingwood get away with pale blue murder? The farcical sight of North Melbourne turning out in a sleeveless variation on the Argentine national soccer strip, with the blue stripes barely distinguishable from the white – for a “home” game, mark you – was the latest example of the league’s weak-kneed stance on this issue, which has included the approval of Collingwood’s so-called clash jumper even though it is no such thing.

To add insult to injury the Kangaroos wore white shorts instead of the traditional home-team black, which Collingwood wore even though they were the “visitors” at Telstra Dome.

This came only a few days after the AFL hammered Hawthorn president Jeff Kennett with instructions to attend a course on umpiring (he chose to pay a $5000 fine instead) while almost simultaneously letting Collingwood coach Mick Malthouse’s on-field tirade towards the umpires go unpunished.

Malthouse’s behaviour, it seems, was overlooked because the Magpies sent a delegation to have a fireside chat to the AFL, and president Eddie McGuire emerged offering a mealy-mouthed homily to remind the rest of the world to be nicer to the umpires.

The same Eddie McGuire who has reminded the same rest of the world that Collingwood will never, ever, wear a change strip because the black and white stripes are sacred relics never to be put to the indignity of being left in the clubhouse while the team wears something to distinguish itself from the home team when playing away.

It’s OK for Carlton, the Western Bulldogs, St Kilda, Richmond and the other 11 clubs in the competition to toe the line, but not Collingwood, no sir.

North Melbourne adopted the Argentina-like strip because its players were unhappy with the previous alternative jersey with its royal blue background, white V and kangaroo.

But surely it should be worn only when the team is playing away, as is the case in other major competitions such as English soccer’s Premier League and other major club competitions around the world, as well as international games.

Manchester United, Liverpool and Chelsea, to quote a few, all wear white, yellow, grey or some other distinguishing colour when their red or blue clashes with their hosts.

Last month Aston Villa had to wear their third strip when the referee thought their home colours were too similar to West Ham’s away kit.

The only real concern this caused was that the club sponsor’s logo wasn’t on the shirts in the first half.

The incident provoked some fans’ memories of how, faced with similar problems in the past, it had been known for a team to wear its opponent’s alternative strip!

So how come Collingwood can defy all logic and common sense?

That’s easy, Eddie will tell you – because we’re Collingwood, we wear black and white stripes and that’s that.

The irony of all this is that the club is throwing away hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Just think of all the moolah that would flow into the Magpies’ coffers from sales of, say, an all-black jumper with a magpie big enough to take on a flock of eagles emblazoned across the front.

But perhaps the real reason for Eddie’s obstinate stance is fear.

Fear that the descendants of the women who used to sit in the front row on the outer fence at Victoria Park and give opposition players a whack with their rolled-up brollies when the chance presented itself might come out of the woodwork and take to him.

Especially in these though economic times, when adding another hundred bucks to the family budget so little Johnny can play away to the Kangaroos in the park kick-around would be likely to go down like the proverbial lead balloon.

Just like umpires boss Jeff Gieschen’s view that you can’t push an opponent in the front or side has provoked outrage among some commentators.

It depends on the circumstances. Law 15.4.3(b) says pushing in the chest or side is OK if the ball is within five metres; but 15.4.5(d) bans any pushing if the opponent is “in the act of marking or attempting to mark the football”.

Simple, really.

Isn’t it?

Roaring Hot

Yesterday’s most commented articles

The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down [67 comments]
Australian teams at Super disadvantage [58 comments]
Does the A-League need an injection of humour? [43 comments]

Most read articles last 3 days

Article link: Collingwood’s jumper stance defies belief. Written by Bruce Walkley, on The Roar - Your Sports Opinion

Home ground advantage – just steer clear of the graveyard

Bruce Walkley — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:03:11 +0000

Brad Sewell of Hawthorn in action during the AFL ANZAC Day Round 05 match between the Hawthorn Hawks and the West Coast Eagles at Aurora Stadium. Slattery Images

The system under which Victorian-based clubs mostly play “home” games at either the MCG or Docklands has all but robbed those clubs of traditional home-ground advantage.

The Roar » Bruce Walkley

Collingwood’s jumper stance defies belief

Roaring Hot

Home ground advantage – just steer clear of the graveyard

Upfront defence is pinning opponents’ backs to the wall

For credibility’s sake, give us neutral umpires

Tell the umpires to shut up!

The Dogs are barking – and they’ll bite, too

Hey brother, can Cousins deliver the goods?

The Dream Team I see when I AM actually dreaming

The Dream Team I saw when I wasn’t dreaming

The double booking of the Telstra Dome is a joke

Delete the word ‘free’ from ‘free agency’

Lynch law the only way to unite Tasmanian footy fans

Scrap the pre-season and have a fair dinkum draw

Wallace’s future largely in Cousins hands

The writing is on the wall for restrictive trade rules

AFL should get fair dinkum with drug tests

Demons, Eagles will struggle to match Hawks’ rise

Forget rushed behinds furore, just protect the ball-getters

Nine won’t prop up the rights price next time around

Hawks v Saints in Tassie? Spend up or dream on

Dew on the ground puts skids under the Cats

Put the red marker pen through Brownlow ineligible players

Sydney and Brisbane viewers still on the outer

Dogs can break 3,646 day drought to reach prelim final

Give Wallace his due, and another three-year contract

Top picks have been a disaster for Swans

The Walkley awards

Ten into eight won’t go, so hang on to your hats

Swans under the hammer as form goes topsy-turvy

This week’s Walkley awards